Taking Weekend Tennis Seriously

Don't mess with me. I will beat you in tennis. Ummmm, eventually…
  • rss
  • Home
  • About Me

You Are Your USTA Rating

Christy Vutam | August 14, 2012

If you are a frequent reader of this blog, you know that USTA is very important.  Or, maybe you don’t.  Maybe I just think I’ve written that line in every blog post, when in reality, I’ve only thought it every time I write an entry.  I think a lot of things.  Luckily, I don’t always write them down.

…that’s frightening, actually, if you think about it…

Anyway, USTA is very important.  It is the be-all, end-all of weekend warrior tennis leagues.  It is the only governing body that matters.  If you don’t play USTA, you are not a serious weekend tennis player.

Why we decided to go with the league that plays in the blistering hot summer as if we aren’t all out-of-shape, aging pedestrians, I don’t have the foggiest idea.  But that’s a blog post for another day.

ANYWAY.  Because USTA is very important, USTA ratings are the supremely important currency on which the weekend warrior tennis community runs.  They are the measuring sticks by which we limit our abilities.  No, wait, sorry.  That was a slip-up on the ole typewriter.  How embarrassing!  Let me try again.

USTA ratings define who we are as tennis players.  They dictate whether we will win or lose.  They are how we know what our self-worth is.  They are how we know who to fraternize with.  USTA ratings are everything.

Asking a person’s rating is tennis’s equivalent of asking the Inevitable Cocktail-Party Question, “What do you do?”  What are you rated is tennis society’s innocent way of asking are you important?  How much money do you make?  Are you someone I want to play with?  Are you worth my time?

Of course, we would put so much stock into this measuring stick.  We all know that USTA has a very scientific, very clear, and methodical way of rating players.  Its process is transparent and accurate and reflects true sense of skill level.  I will beat you because I am rated higher than you.  I can’t associate with you because you are rated lower than me.  I can’t play with you because the number next to your name is not the same as mine.

Say you’re playing a doubles match just for fun and you are rated lower than the others.  There is not a more effective way to sabotage you than to let you know where you stand in the Hierarchy of the Weekend Warrior Tennis World (have everyone say what their rating is).  You are not as good as the others; you do not belong; you will not win.  It’s cute that you’re trying though.

Someday, you will have accumulated enough Chuck-E-Cheese tokens to be promoted to the next rating level.  Someday, you will have succeeded in life.  Then you will have arrived and all your troubles will go away and you will be able to hit the shots you couldn’t before.  That’s the way life works.

Happy Playing!

Share this:

  • Email
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • More
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Pocket
  • Tumblr
  • Pinterest

Like this:

Like Loading...
Categories
Rant, Ratings
Tags
funny tennis, Ratings, Recreational tennis, tennis, tennis blog, USTA, USTA NTRP, Weekend Warrior Tennis
Comments rss
Comments rss
Trackback
Trackback

« Who Watches Weekend Warrior Tennis? Not me! Organizational He– »

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Number Of Days Since I've Thrown My Racquet

  • 1814 days ago

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Recent Posts

  • This Won’t Be The Year
  • Miss Me?
  • Not At All According To Plan
  • Captaining Never Stops
  • Anything I Can Do, You Can Do Better

Links

  • US Tennis Congress
  • Road to 4.5 Tennis
  • Non-Traditional MBA Doin’ It For Herself
  • Kevin Schmidt’s Computer Ratings
  • My Tennis Tools – For All Your Tennis Camera Needs

Archives

  • May 2020 (1)
  • June 2019 (1)
  • June 2016 (1)
  • January 2016 (1)
  • November 2015 (1)
  • October 2015 (1)
  • September 2015 (1)
  • August 2015 (1)
  • July 2015 (1)
  • May 2015 (1)
  • April 2015 (3)
  • March 2015 (2)
  • January 2015 (1)
  • December 2014 (1)
  • November 2014 (1)
  • October 2014 (1)
  • September 2014 (1)
  • August 2014 (2)
  • June 2014 (2)
  • May 2014 (2)
  • April 2014 (2)
  • March 2014 (1)
  • February 2014 (2)
  • January 2014 (4)
  • December 2013 (4)
  • November 2013 (4)
  • October 2013 (1)
  • September 2013 (2)
  • August 2013 (1)
  • July 2013 (3)
  • June 2013 (1)
  • May 2013 (2)
  • April 2013 (3)
  • March 2013 (3)
  • February 2013 (7)
  • January 2013 (7)
  • November 2012 (1)
  • October 2012 (2)
  • September 2012 (2)
  • August 2012 (2)
  • July 2012 (4)
  • June 2012 (5)
  • May 2012 (6)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox
%d